Does a tailored ablation strategy targeting Atrial Electrogram Duration Map (AEDUM) areas in addition to pulmonary vein isolation reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone?
A tailored ablation strategy targeting areas of prolonged atrial bipolar electrograms (AEDUM) in addition to PVI significantly reduces AF recurrence compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Abstract Background Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation ( Ps AF) represents a challenge for the electrophysiologist and there are still divergences regarding the best ablative approach to adopt. Create a new map of the duration of atrial bipolar electrograms (Atrial Electrogram DUration Map, AEDUM) to recognize a functional substrate during sinus rhythm and guide a patient-tailored ablative strategy for Ps AF. Methods Forty Ps AF subjects were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either for PVI alone (Group B 1 ) or PVI+AEDUM areas ablation (Group B 2 ). A cohort of 15 patients without AF history undergoing left-sided accessory pathway ablation was used as a control group (Group A). In all patients, voltage and AEDUM maps were created during sinus rhythm. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, with rhythm monitoring via 48-h ECG Holter or by implantable cardiac device. Results Electrogram (EGM) duration was higher in Group B than in Group A (49±16.2ms vs 34.2±3.8ms; p -value<0.001). In Group B the mean cumulative AEDUM area was 21.8±8.2cm 2 ; no difference between the two subgroups was observed (22.3±9.1cm 2 vs 21.2±7.2cm 2 ; p -value=0.45). The overall bipolar voltage recorded inside the AEDUM areas was lower than in the remaining atrial areas median: 1.30mV (IQR: 0.71–2.38mV) vs 1.54mV (IQR: 0.79–2.97mV); p -value: <0.001). Low voltage areas (<0.5mV) were recorded in three (7.5%) patients in Group B. During the follow-up median 511 days (376–845days) patients who underwent PVI-only experienced more AF recurrence than those receiving a tailored approach (65% vs 35%; p -value= 0.04). Conclusions All PsAF patients exhibited AEDUM areas. An ablation approach targeting these areas resulted in a more effective strategy compared with PVI only. Graphical Abstract
Rossi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.