Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the two most commonly used oxygen delivery methods for the treatment of thermal burn wound healing: hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and topical oxygen therapy (TOT). METHOD: The PubMed database was searched for articles discussing the use of HBOT or TOT in the treatment of thermal burns. RESULTS: The search yielded 43,406 articles, of which 28 (23 HBOT, 5 TOT) met the inclusion criteria. Both experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated conflicting results after treating thermal burns with HBOT or TOT. Overall, 14/23 studies demonstrated positive results for HBOT on the healing of burn wounds and associated complications, such as oedema and pain. Findings from these studies showed it can reduce morbidity and mortality in certain high-risk groups such as those with diabetes or extensive burns. Although the five studies (one human and four animal trials) reviewing TOT showed promising outcomes, this therapeutic modality has not been well investigated. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic use of HBOT in thermal burns has been popular in the past but its use remains controversial due to inconsistent results, serious side-effects, lack of convenience and high costs. The use of TOT in the management of burns needs further exploration by scientists and clinicians alike, in addition to the implementation of a standardised treatment protocol.
Khan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.