Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article draws on a multi-sited study involving 307 interviews with labeled youth across Europe to argue that methodological improvisations can deepen, rather than dilute, ethnographic practice. Confronted with limited access, what began as a practical decision (to forgo audio recording and go online) quickly evolved into a methodological provocation. Rather than treating these adaptations as compromises, we demonstrate how they enhanced trust, protected participant anonymity, and enabled rich, context-sensitive data collection. Through vivid tales from the field, we show how non-recorded, hand-written transcriptions preserved the emotional and narrative depth of interviews, while virtual platforms expanded access without sacrificing rapport. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions about rigor in research and argue for a more flexible, ethically attuned ethnographic practice. We conclude by offering practical recommendations for conducting fieldwork with hard-to-reach populations and suggest that, under the right conditions, methodological departures from tradition can generate meaningful insights and deepen researchers’ accountability to their participants.
Ayşenur Benevento (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: