PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1982Circulation46 citationsOpen Access

Fluid dynamics of aortic stenosis: subvalvular gradients without subvalvular obstruction.

View Full Paper
JBJulio J. BirdGundersen Health SystemJMJoseph P. MurgoThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioAPAres PasipoularidesDuke University

Key Points

  • To determine whether fluid dynamic acceleration in a tapering outflow tract generates significant subvalvular pressure gradients in valvular aortic stenosis without a secondary anatomic obstruction.
  • Evaluated 11 patients with valvular aortic stenosis (mean age 64 ± 11 years; mean valve area 1.0 ± 0.3 cm²) using catheters equipped with two laterally mounted micromanometers.

Structured PICO

P
Population
11 patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) without anatomic evidence of subvalvular obstruction, mean age 64 +/- 11 years, mean valve area 1.0 +/- 0.3 cm2.
I
Intervention
Hemodynamic measurement using a catheter with two laterally mounted micromanometers.
O
Outcome
Subvalvular pressure gradients (LV-LVOT and LV-AO gradients).surrogate

Large subvalvular pressure gradients exist in patients with valvular aortic stenosis due to fluid dynamics, even without anatomic subvalvular obstruction.

Abstract

Analysis of a tapering, pulsatile flow field predicts that substantial subvalvular pressure gradients exist in patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) without invoking a second anatomic site of obstruction. Using a catheter with two laterally mounted micromanometers, we examined the left ventricle in 11 patients with AS, mean age 64 +/- 11 years (+/- SD); the mean valve area was 1.0 +/- 0.3 cm2. Simultaneous measurements were made in (1) the left ventricular (LV) chamber and the LV outflow tract (LVOT) and (2) the LVOT and ascending aorta (AO). No patient had anatomic evidence of a subvalvular obstruction, but large subvalvular gradients were present in all. The average peak LV-LVOT and LV-AO gradients were 41 +/- 17 mm Hg and 58 +/- 23 mm Hg, respectively. Flow velocity was electromagnetically derived in two patients. The LV-LVOT gradient was associated with an increased flow velocity in the LVOT. This study suggests that large subvalvular gradients are present in AS and help overcome blood's inertia to convective and local accelerations in the tapering subvalvular flow field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bird et al. (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a9715382248a45185a1b2https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.66.4.835
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states2019 · 24 citations
  2. 2Classification of Aortic Stenosis by Flow and Gradient Patterns Provides Insights into the Pathophysiology of Disease2015 · 6 citations
  3. 3Fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis1988 · 69 citations
  4. 4Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area: Figure 12010 · 33 citations
  5. 5Hemodynamic Assessment of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Valvular Aortic Stenosis1996 · 23 citations