Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The first objective of this article is to clarify which model best captures the structure and trend of the influence of social origin on children's education.The second objective is to analyse how general conclusions on historical trends in educational reproduction change if we add the mother's status background to the model.Six contrasting hypotheses are derived from the body of literature dealing with models on families' socioeconomic status.All hypotheses are translated into empirical models and their explained variance is compared.A pooled data set is used that contains data from the Netherlands, West Germany, and the USA.The Modified Dominance Model, that distinguishes the influence of the highest from the lowest status parent, has the best model fit.Regarding the second objective we see that adding the mother's influence to that of the father's does not change general conclusions on trends in educational reproduction.Over time the influence of both parents decreases continuously.However, the influence of the mother's education and occupational status on children's educational attainment is substantive.
Korupp et al. (Tue,) studied this question.