PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1988British journal of surgery64 citations

The task of a statistical referee

View Full Paper
GMGordon MurrayMarquette University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The results are presented of an audit of the statistical standard of papers published in The British Journal of Surgery. A number of deficiencies are highlighted, many of which stem from an over-emphasis on statistical significance at the expense of any assessment of the clinical relevance of research findings. The flaws in the design of published studies, and in particular the many instances of inadequate sample sizes, emphasize that statistical input should be sought at the beginning of a research project rather than at the end.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gordon Murray (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1be9cf00ee29383e9d24a0https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800750714
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper