PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1994Journal of Personality Assessment64 citations

Validation of Cramer's Defense Mechanism Manual for the TAT

View Full Paper
SHStephen HibbardLFLynn FarmerCWCourtney Wells

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Twenty-nine successive admissions to an acute psychiatric ward of a VA hospital and 40 college undergraduates were given group administrations of six Thematic Apperception Test (TAT: Murray, 1943) cards. The written responses were coded according to Cramer's defense mechanism manual (1990), which codes three types of defense: Denial, Projection, and Identification. Denial is supposed to be the most “primitive.” and Identification is supposed to be the least primitive of these. Each is codable on seven levels, which also range from more primitive to more mature types of defense. The psychiatric patients both used more primitive types of defense (more Denial and Projection, less Identification) and within types, used a higher percentage of lower level fprimitive) defenses. The results are viewed as providing validity for Cramer's manual from a research team unaffiliated with her lab. Reliability issues are also discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hibbard et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c8e071d5b34640aa15b99https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper