Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The levels of DNA relatedness for a broad sample of Xenorhabdus strains isolated from different species of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) and from different geographical sources were estimated by the hydroxyapatite method. The level of DNA-DNA relatedness for the two phases of each isolate tested was not significantly different from 100%, demonstrating unequivocally that the phase variation demonstrated by all Xenorhabdus spp. is not due to contamination. The isolates of the described Xenorhabdus species coalesced into different DNA relatedness groups, confirming that Xenorhabdus nematophilus, Xenorhabdus bovienii, Xenorhabdus poinarii, and Xenorhabdus beddingii, defined on the basis of phenotypic differences, are valid species. The symbiont of Steinemema intermedia also coalesced with the X. bovienii isolates. This was the only symbiont of seven recently described and unamed Steinemema spp. (including Steinemema ritteri, Steinemema rara, and Steinemema anomali) that formed a group with any of the previously described Xenorhabdus species; new species descriptions are required to accommodate the other taxa, but too few isolates were available to allow satisfactory descriptions of them. The DNA relatedness data also showed that the bacteria currently classified as Xenorhabdus luminescens are significantly different from all other Xenorhabdus strains. These data strongly support indications from previous studies of phenotypic characteristics, cellular fatty acids, and DNA relatedness that X. luminescens should be classified as a separate genus. A new genus, Photorhabdus, with an amended description of the type species, Photorhabdus luminescens, is proposed.
Boemare et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: