PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2015Advances in Therapy36 citationsOpen Access

Early Experience of Pirfenidone in Daily Clinical Practice in Belgium and The Netherlands: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis

MWMarlies WijsenbeekJGJan C. GruttersWWWim Wuyts

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of pirfenidone for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical records of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate IPF (as per European Medicines Agency indication) and receiving pirfenidone treatment across three centers in Belgium and the Netherlands between April 2011 and October 2013 were retrospectively collected from patient notes at 3-month intervals. Pulmonary function measurements, including % predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and % predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (%DLCO), were analyzed from 6 months prior to pirfenidone treatment up to 12 months of treatment. Decline in lung function, defined as an absolute ≥10% decline in FVC from baseline or death at 12 months, was also analyzed. Safety data were included for all follow-up visits. RESULTS: In the pooled cohort (n = 63), patients were mostly men (84.1%) and current or former smokers (79.4%). Average baseline %FVC and %DLCO were 75.0% and 47.9%, respectively. 69.8% of patients had a high-resolution computed tomography scan with a definite usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, and 46% had a surgical lung biopsy. The mean decline in %FVC for 32 patients with available data was 4.8% from -6 months to baseline (p = 0.002) and 0.8% from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.516). Across these time intervals, a lesser decline in DLCO was similarly observed during therapy. At 12 months, ten patients had an %FVC decline ≥10% or died. Loss of appetite (25.3%) and nausea (11.1%) were the most frequent gastrointestinal side effects. Nausea was the most highly cited reason for discontinuation (7.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical practice cohort, pirfenidone showed effectiveness and safety profiles consistent with those seen in the Phase III clinical study ASCEND (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01366209). These results highlight the challenges and benefits associated with pirfenidone treatment in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wijsenbeek et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f4954fe2692e41a2aac26https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0225-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Klinische Erfahrungen mit Pirfenidon in der Therapie der idiopathischen Lungenfibrose2013 · 19 citations
  2. 2Utility of a Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis2001 · 555 citations
  3. 3The rising incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the UK2011 · 491 citations
  4. 4Pirfenidone post-authorization safety registry (PASSPORT) – Interim analysis of IPF treatment2014 · 15 citations
  5. 5Safety and efficacy of pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in clinical practice2013 · 99 citations