The Accurate24 calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor accurately estimated blood pressure with a mean error of 2.15 ± 3.41 mmHg for systolic pressure compared to a reference sphygmomanometer, passing ANSI/AAMI/ISO standards.
Cross-Sectional (n=129)
No
Does a calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor accurately estimate blood pressure compared to a reference sphygmomanometer in volunteers?
A novel wearable calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor demonstrated high accuracy compared to a reference sphygmomanometer, passing ANSI/AAMI/ISO standards and offering a potential alternative to traditional ambulatory monitoring.
Mean Difference: 2.15
p-value: p=<0.05
This study proposes a novel calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor (BPM). Unlike the cuffless BPM that requires timing correction with the traditional BPM, the calibration-free cuffless BPM can directly estimate the arterial blood pressure (BP) based on the hemodynamics mathematical model. Our proposed device integrates a pair of piezoelectric ceramics as pressure sensors to sense the pressure wave in the radial artery. It calculates the local pulse wave velocity (PWV) with our waveform detection algorithm of our proposed one. A photoplethysmogram (PPG) probe is set between the pair of pressure wave sensors. This PPG probe is used to monitor the radial artery’s PPG intensity ratio (PIR). We design PPG signal processing algorithms to quantify the PIR. We recruited 129 participants for the BP monitoring experiment. Compared with the reference sphygmomanometer, the error mean ± standard deviations (STDs) systolic BP (SBP) was 2. 1 ± 3. 4, and the correlation r-value was 0. 97. The diastolic BP (DBP) was 0. 8 ± 4. 2, the correlation r-value was 0. 90, and p < 0. 05 is taken as statistically significant. A new type of wearable continuous calibration-free BPM can replace the situation that requires the use of traditional ambulatory BPM and reduce patient discomfort. Our proposed BP measurement passed all ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 20181₅. 2. 4. 1. 2 data analysis criterion 1 and 2 standard requirements.
Guo et al. (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure monitoring (n=129). Accurate24 BPM (calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor) vs. Standard Korotkoff manometry device (sphygmomanometer) was evaluated on Mean difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to reference sphygmomanometer (MD 2.15 mmHg, p=<0.05). The Accurate24 calibration-free cuffless blood pressure monitor accurately estimated blood pressure with a mean error of 2.15 ± 3.41 mmHg for systolic pressure compared to a reference sphygmomanometer, passing ANSI/AAMI/ISO standards.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: