Both ICaL inactivation and INCX activation can be used to report dynamic changes of [Ca²⁺] near ryanodine receptors, yielding similar absolute values and suggesting they report on a similar functional compartment.
During Ca²⁺ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum triggered by Ca²⁺ influx through L-type Ca²⁺ channels (LTCCs), Ca²⁺ near release sites (Ca²⁺nrs) temporarily exceeds global cytosolic Ca²⁺. Ca²⁺nrs can at present not be measured directly but the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) near release sites and LTCCs also experience Ca²⁺nrs. We have tested the hypothesis that ICaL and INCX could be calibrated to report Ca²⁺nrs and would report different time course and values for local Ca²⁺. Experiments were performed in pig ventricular myocytes (whole-cell voltage-clamp, Fluo-3 to monitor global cytosolic Ca²⁺, 37◦C). Ca²⁺nrs-dependent inactivation of ICaL during a step to +10 mV peaked around 10 ms. For INCX we computationally isolateda current fraction activated by Ca²⁺nrs; values were maximal at 10 ms into depolarization. The recovery of Ca²⁺nrs was comparable with both reporters (>90% within 50 ms). Calibration yielded maximal values for Ca²⁺nrs between 10 and 15 μmol l⁻¹ with both methods. When applied to a step to less positive potentials (-30 to -20 mV), the time course of Ca²⁺nrs was slower but peak values were not very different. In conclusion, both ICaL inactivation and INCX activation, using a subcomponent analysis, can be used to report dynamic changes of Ca²⁺nrs. Absolute values obtained by these different methods are within the same range, suggesting that they are reporting on a similar functional compartment near ryanodine receptors. Comparable Ca²⁺nrs at +10 mV and -20 mV suggests that, although the number of activated release sites differs at these potentials, local gradients at release sites can reach similar values.
Acsai et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: