Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract In this article, I place Dennis Robertson’s popular book Money in the context of its time in order to make a simple point about the scope and limits of history of economic thought and social ontology. The argument is supported by a detailed appendix in three parts that discusses the history of coinage and banknotes, provides some context on the economy of the mid-1920s, and explores how money was spent, how credit was made available and how debt was viewed through social norms of the time. In the main article, based on discussion of the problem of attributing to the thing positioned features of the positioned thing, I argue that social ontology benefits from both history of economic thought and historical sociological considerations and foci.
Jamie Morgan (Tue,) studied this question.