PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Animal Feed Science and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Does biochar inclusion affect the in vitro ruminal fermentation of tropical beef cattle diets?

View Full Paper
JSJ.M.C. SouzaIFI.G. FáveroPCP.J.R. Cruz

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess how varying levels of biochar affect ruminal fermentation and methane emissions in beef cattle diets.
  • Conducted three experiments to determine biochar inclusion levels and compare effects with monensin and nitrate.
  • Used both forage-based and concentrate-based diets; monitored gas production and digestibility.
  • Evaluated four independent incubation runs with different biochar levels ranging from 0 to 40 g/kg dry matter.
  • Biochar inclusion of 40 g/kg significantly reduced methane yield by 12% for high-forage diets.
  • Elevations in NH3-N concentration noted with biochar and nitrate compared to control and monensin.
  • No significant methane reductions observed with biochar addition in subsequent studies, regardless of diet type.

Abstract

ABSTRACT We evaluate the effects of biochar ( BIO ) on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane production, and digestibility of tropical beef cattle diets. The BIO effects were assessed in three different studies: I) Determination of the inclusion level in beef cattle diets (Exp. 1 and 2); II) Comparative effects of BIO with monensin ( MON ) and nitrate ( NIT ) on ruminal fermentation parameters (Exp. 3 and 4); III) Comparison of the effects of BIO with MON and nitrate NIT on the extension of ruminal in vitro digestibility (Exp. 5 and 6). In each study, we evaluated a forage-based and concentrate-based diet ( FOR and CON , forage-to-concentrate ratio of 80:20 and 20:80, corresponding to odd and even experiments, respectively). For the Exp. 1 and 2, five inclusion levels of BIO were tested (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 g/kg dry matter, DM ) in four independent incubation runs to evaluate gas production ( GP ), in vitro organic matter digestibility ( IVOMD ), and enteric methane ( CH 4 ). The BIO inclusion in FOR (Exp. 1) linearly decreased (P 0.13) when compared to CON diet (Exp. 4). However, NH 3 -N concentration increased with BIO and NIT compared to control and MON (53.3 and 55.9 vs. 45.8 and 44.9 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.05). In Study III, the same treatments for Study II were evaluated in jar incubators to evaluate the in vitro digestibilities. For FOR (Exp. 5), only IVADFD was affected by the treatments (P = 0.02), with BIO presenting greater values (P < 0.05) than the others. For CON diet (Exp. 6), greatest IVNDFD and IVADFD were observed when BIO and NIT were included (P < 0.001). We concluded that 40 g of BIO/kg DM inclusion level decreased CH 4 yield by about 12% when high-forage diet was incubated. However, subsequent studies did not present significant CH 4 reductions with BIO addition, regardless of diet type. BIO promoted positive effects on NH 3 -N concentration and fiber digestibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Souza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21151ad499ed480b16e6f9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2026.116877
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper