PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Current Issues in Molecular Biology0 citationsOpen Access

One Diet Does Not Fit All: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene–Diet Interactions Affecting Blood Lipid Profiles

View Full Paper
SISaba IordanishviliIlia State UniversityNCNazibrola ChiradzeDiabetes AustraliaDADodo AgladzeAIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center

Key Points

  • To assess how genetic factors influence individual responses to dietary changes in blood lipid levels.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies
  • Analyzed interactions between diet components and lipid-related genes
  • Utilized a weighted Stouffer’s Z method for p-value synthesis
  • Identified 20 studies with approximately 9800 participants
  • Strongest evidence for CETP, APOE, and APOB gene interactions with macronutrients, especially fats
  • PUFA shown to be the most consistent dietary exposure impacting lipid profiles

Abstract

Blood lipid responses to diet vary substantially between individuals, limiting the effectiveness of uniform dietary recommendations, and genetic variation may contribute to this heterogeneity through gene–diet interactions. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated nutrigenetic interactions affecting blood lipid traits. Web of Science Core Collection and MEDLINE were searched in April 2026 to identify human studies testing interactions between dietary exposures—including macronutrient composition, fat quantity, fat type polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and saturated fatty acids (SFA), carbohydrate, and protein—and lipid-related genes. Interaction p-values were synthesized using a weighted Stouffer’s Z method with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Twenty studies (n = 20), comprising approximately 9800 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The most consistent evidence was observed for CETP, APOE, and APOB, particularly in relation to broader macronutrient composition and fat-related exposures, while ABCA1 and APOA5 showed significant but more limited evidence. PUFA was the most consistent specific dietary exposure. In contrast, ABCG5, ABCG8, and CYP7A1 lacked sufficient data for meta-analysis, highlighting major gaps in the current literature. Overall, the findings support the view that lipid responses to diet are partly genotype-dependent, while also underscoring the need for larger, better harmonized studies to clarify and extend the current evidence base.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iordanishvili et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2267f6763171746d5467d6https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060591
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Personalised Nutrition in Obesity and Prediabetes: Do Genotypes Matter?2026
  2. 2Gene–Diet Interactions in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies and Clinical Trials2026
  3. 3Abstract MPTH76: Genetic Propensity Modifies the Association Between Saturated Fat Intake and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol2026
  4. 4Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Clinical Cardiology and Dietary Intervention: A Narrative Review2026
  5. 5Gene-educational attainment interactions in a multi-population genome-wide meta-analysis identify novel lipid loci2023 · 5 citations