Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The aim of this analysis was to examine sex-based differences in renal segmental resistances in healthy controls (HCs) and patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We hypothesized that hyperfiltration—an early hemodynamic abnormality associated with diabetic nephropathy—would disproportionately affect women with T1D, thereby attenuating protection against the development of renal complications. Glomerular hemodynamic parameters were evaluated in HC ( n = 30) and in normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with T1D and either baseline normofiltration n = 36, T1D-N, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 90–134 ml·min −1 ·1.73 m 2 or hyperfiltration ( n = 32, T1D-H, GFR ≥ 135 ml·min −1 ·1.73 m 2 ) during euglycemic conditions (4–6 mmol/l). Gomez’s equations were used to derive efferent (R E ) and afferent (R A ) arteriolar resistances, glomerular hydrostatic pressure (P GLO ) from inulin (GFR) and paraaminohippurate effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) clearances, plasma protein and estimated ultrafiltration coefficients (K FG ). Female patients with T1D with hyperfiltration (T1D-H) had higher R E (1,985 ± 487 vs. 1,381 ± 296 dyne·sec −1 ·cm −5 , P < 0.001) and filtration fraction (FF, 0.20 ± 0.047 vs. 0.16 ± 0.03 P < 0.05) and lower ERPF (876 ± 245 vs. 1,111 ± 298 134 ml·min −1 ·1.73 m 2 P < 0.05) compared with male T1D-H patients. Overall, T1D-H patients had higher P GLO and lower R A vs. HC subjects, although there were no sex-based differences. In conclusion, female T1D-H patients had higher R E and FF and lower ERPF than their male counterparts with no associated sex differences in R A . Prospective intervention studies should consider sex as a modifier of renal hemodynamic responses to renal protective therapies.
Škrtić et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: