This article formalizes the Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction (TCCR) as a Scientific Research Programme (SRP), based on the methodology proposed by Imre Lakatos. Its purpose is to delimit the epistemological architecture that makes it possible to understand the TCCR as an open, revisable, and cumulative programme, avoiding both naïve falsificationism and dogmatic immunization. To this end, Hypothesis No. 1 is distinguished as the programme’s hard core, insofar as it establishes that human narratives coexist and co-emerge within a Cognosystem understood as a sociohistorical, societal, reticular, and historical-contextual suprasystem of signification, attached to a specific society and period. Hypotheses No. 2 to No. 15, in turn, are organized as a protective belt of auxiliary propositions that are revisable and subject to conditions of weakening, revision, or critical pressure. The article also reconstructs the negative heuristic of the TCCR, aimed at rationally protecting the hard core without turning it into dogma, and its positive heuristic, directed toward producing derived hypotheses, indicators, operationalizations, cognosystemic cartographies, and empirical studies on stabilization, friction, memetic circulation, and narrative change. It is concluded that the scientific status of the TCCR does not depend on treating its ontological core as an isolated empirical prediction, but rather on demonstrating that, on the basis of that core, the programme generates new theoretical content, testable expectations, replicable instruments, and progressive developments for investigating the construction, stabilization, dispute, and transformation of psychosocial reality.
Jalin Eliezer Simunovic Menares (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: