In this contemporary era rapidly increasing digital transformation of higher education institutions in India has accelerated the development of “smart campuses,” where technologies such as biometric attendance systems, CCTV surveillance, facial recognition, data analytics, and artificial intelligence are increasingly integrated into administrative and academic processes. While these innovations promise enhanced security, efficient governance, and improved campus management, they simultaneously raise significant concerns regarding the protection of individual privacy and fundamental rights of students and faculty. The expansion of digital surveillance within educational spaces has created a complex tension between institutional security measures and the constitutional guarantee of privacy recognized under Article 21 of the Constitution of India following the landmark judgment in Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India. This article critically examines the emerging landscape of digital surveillance in Indian higher education institutions and evaluates its implications for the right to privacy, informational autonomy, and academic freedom. It indicates the regulatory gaps in existing legal and policy frameworks governing the collection, storage, and use of personal data within educational environments. Particular attention is given to the policy challenges associated with biometric monitoring, AI-driven proctoring systems, and large-scale data management practices in universities. This article further analyzes how the vision of technologically advanced campuses promoted through the National Education Policy 2020 may inadvertently intensify privacy vulnerabilities in the absence of clear accountability and ethical safeguards. This article Adopting a doctrinal and policy-oriented research approach, the paper proposes a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing technological innovation with constitutional protections. It advocates the establishment of institutional data governance mechanisms, transparent surveillance policies, informed consent standards, and independent oversight structures to ensure that digital monitoring practices remain proportionate, necessary, and legally justified. By situating the discussion within the broader discourse of digital rights and educational governance, the study seeks to contribute to the formulation of balanced policy guidelines that protect individual liberties while enabling safe and technologically progressive learning environments in Indian higher education.
Dr. Vandana Bhivsa Sirsath (Rajeshri Gawali) (Fri,) studied this question.