Abstract This article offers a novel account of Heidegger's long‐debated discussion of a painting of shoes by Van Gogh in ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’. I argue that the Van Gogh episode is best understood as a carefully staged textual enactment of Heidegger's conception of artistic experience, properly construed. On my reconstruction, such experience involves a transformative reconfiguration of the experiencer's context of disclosure – a dynamic I refer to as ‘contextual displacement’. After laying out this conception, along with two further background assumptions that inform my approach (concerning the reliability of equipment and its ‘fading away’), I present a fine‐grained reconstruction of the Van Gogh episode, foregrounding its performative dimensions and complex internal structure. I then show how the contextually displacing character of artistic experience accounts for these features, making sense of why Heidegger constructs the episode as he does. I conclude by contrasting my approach with that of Stephen Mulhall, who highlights similar aspects of the episode but arrives at strikingly different conclusions.
Andrea Vitangeli (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: