This study examines how energy market uncertainty affects corporate financial stability and whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigates this relationship. Using a panel of 168 non-financial Australian firms from 2011 to 2023, we employ a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) with extensive robustness checks. The results reveal three central findings. First, energy market uncertainty exerts a statistically significant and economically meaningful negative effect on corporate financial stability, indicating that heightened energy price volatility amplifies firms’ financial fragility. Second, ESG performance is positively associated with financial stability, suggesting that sustainability-oriented firms exhibit superior risk management and resilience. Third, ESG performance significantly attenuates the adverse impact of energy market uncertainty, providing strong evidence that ESG functions as an effective shock-absorbing mechanism. These findings are robust to alternative measures of financial stability and energy uncertainty, different lag structures, alternative estimation methods, and a wide range of subsample analyses. Further analyses show that the moderating role of ESG is not driven by a single pillar; rather, environmental, social, and governance dimensions jointly enhance firms’ capacity to withstand energy-related shocks. The buffering effect of ESG is stronger among high-ESG firms, in knowledge- and technology-intensive sectors, and during periods of heightened systemic stress such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the study provides novel firm-level evidence that ESG performance enhances corporate resilience to energy market uncertainty. The findings have important implications for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers seeking to strengthen financial stability in an era of elevated energy volatility and accelerating sustainability transitions.
Saif-Alyousfi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.