This OSF project archives a project edition of “Rebuttal-Centric Peer Review in the Era of LLM-Accelerated Submissions: A Practitioner’s Proposal for Scalable Evaluation.” The manuscript proposes a rebuttal-centric framework for scalable peer review under conditions of LLM-accelerated submission growth. It argues that peer review failures should be treated not merely as reviewer-level errors, but as institutional responsibility-allocation problems. This project is intended for public access, version fixation, citation, and future scholarly development. The document has not been formally peer reviewed.
Nishikimi Naoki (Thu,) studied this question.