Highway construction projects face interacting risks that affect time, cost, regulatory compliance, and delivery resilience, all of which are closely linked to sustainable infrastructure development. This study develops a hybrid decision-analytical and machine learning framework for sustainability-oriented risk assessment in highway construction under limited-data conditions. The framework combines (i) the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to structure and stress-test expert judgement, and (ii) Probability-Impact (P-I) scoring with a Bayesian Networks (BNs) to model dependencies and derive posterior weights for probability of occurrence, impact on time, and impact on cost across four headline risk factors: weather-related risks, lack of labour, design-related risks, and permitting/regulatory risks. AHP provides transparent and auditable priorities with consistency checks, while GAN-generated synthetic tables support diagnostics for central tendency (P50) and tail behaviour (P90) under data scarcity. The calibrated P-I scores parameterise BN conditional probability tables, enabling the updating of BN scores; and factor-level decomposition of expected contributions. The framework produces model-ready posterior weights that support early planning, contingency allocation, mitigation prioritization, scenario analysis, and subsequent simulation and optimization studies. In sustainability terms, the proposed approach helps project teams improve climate resilience, strengthen regulatory and environmental preparedness, and reduce inefficient use of time, cost, and project resources in data-constrained settings. The results show that permitting/regulatory risks have the highest contribution to probability of occurrence and time impact, while weather-related risks exert the greatest cost impact. The framework therefore offers a practical tool for supporting more resilient, transparent, and sustainable highway project delivery when large historical datasets or questionnaire surveys are unavailable.
Zhasmukhambetova et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: