This paper proposes a formal account of time as temporal architecture rather than as linear chronological succession. It distinguishes chronology, understood as a local traversal-index, from time, understood as the structured architecture of temporal points and temporal relations within which traversal, ordering, adjacency, readability, passage, support, anchoring, and external instantiation become evaluable. The paper introduces the concept of non-linear temporal adjacency. Two temporal points may be distant in a local chronological sequence while remaining structurally adjacent within temporal architecture through a shared constraint, threshold, recoverable kernel, attractor relation, dependency, orientation, transformation path, support condition, or closure-form. On this basis, the future is defined as non-traversed temporal structure relative to a local traversal, rather than as structural absence. The framework provides a formal basis for future-indexed readability. A non-traversed temporal point may become readable before chronological arrival when its relation to the present traversal point satisfies the relevant adjacency and access conditions. Such readability is classified as access to temporal relation, not as prediction, control, event-production, possession, or external realization. The paper also establishes the principle of readability without control. Structural readability does not entail intervention capacity. Prediction, anticipation, and prophecy-like expression are treated as downstream cases of future-indexed readability, while temporal ordering, corridor admissibility, passage, support, anchoring, and external instantiation are reserved for later formal development. The result is an upstream framework for analyzing temporal structure across domains in which chronology alone is insufficient to classify relation, transformation, regime change, support conditions, or future-indexed readability.
Vien Nguyen Son (Wed,) studied this question.