In non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, stress hyperglycemia ratio was a significantly weaker predictor of 28-day mortality compared to admission glucose (AUC 0.6912 vs 0.716, p=0.0351).
Cohort (n=2,311)
No
Does stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) provide better prognostic value for short- and long-term mortality compared to admission blood glucose in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Stress hyperglycemia ratio does not outperform simple admission blood glucose for predicting short- or long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.6912% vs 0.716%
p-value: p=0.0351
AIMS: Prior studies demonstrated an association between hospital admission blood glucose and mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been suggested as a more reliable marker of stress hyperglycemia this study investigated to what extent SHR in comparison with admission blood glucose is associated with short- and long-term mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic AMI patients. METHODS: The analysis was based on 2,311 AMI patients aged 25-84 years from the population-based Myocardial Infarction Registry Augsburg (median follow-up time 6.5 years IQR: 4.9-8.1). The SHR was calculated as admission glucose (mg/dl)/(28.7 × HbA1c (%)-46.7). Using logistic and COX regression analyses the associations between SHR and admission glucose and mortality were investigated. RESULT: Higher admission glucose and higher SHR were significantly and nonlinearly associated with higher 28-day mortality in AMI patients with and without diabetes. In patients without diabetes, the AUC for SHR was significantly lower than for admission glucose (SHR: 0.6912 95%CI 0.6317-0.7496, admission glucose: 0.716 95%CI 0.6572-0.7736, p-value: 0.0351). In patients with diabetes the AUCs were similar for SHR and admission glucose. Increasing admission glucose and SHR were significantly nonlinearly associated with higher 5-year all-cause mortality in AMI patients with diabetes but not in non-diabetic patients. AUC values indicated a comparable prediction of 5-year mortality for both measures in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stress hyperglycemia in AMI patients plays a significant role mainly with regard to short-term prognosis, but barely so for long-term prognosis, underlining the assumption that it is a transient dynamic disorder that occurs to varying degrees during the acute event, thereby affecting prognosis.
Schmitz et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=2,311). Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) vs. Admission glucose was evaluated on Prediction of 28-day mortality (AUC) in non-diabetic patients (95% CI 0.6317-0.7496, p=0.0351). In non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, stress hyperglycemia ratio was a significantly weaker predictor of 28-day mortality compared to admission glucose (AUC 0.6912 vs 0.716, p=0.0351).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: