PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 9, 2026BMC Oral Health0 citationsOpen Access

Gingival phenotype assessment: a comparative study of a novel CBCT-based measurement technique and transgingival probing

NZNing ZhangGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionJDJijun DongGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionSQShuang QuPeople 's Liberation Army 451 Hospital

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the accuracy of a novel CBCT protocol for measuring gingival thickness compared to transgingival probing.
  • Cross-sectional study involving 39 periodontally healthy patients
  • Gingival thickness measured at multiple sites with both CBCT and transgingival probing
  • Agreement and diagnostic performance analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and Deming regression.
  • CBCT measurements correlated strongly with transgingival probing (ρ > 0.98, p < 0.001)
  • Deming regression showed a constant systemic error with CBCT underestimating thickness by approximately 0.04 mm (95% CI: -0.053 to -0.035)
  • CBCT demonstrated 100% specificity and > 96% sensitivity for identifying thick phenotypes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of a novel, non-invasive cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based protocol for measuring gingival thickness in the maxillary anterior region, using transgingival probing (TGP) as the reference standard. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 39 periodontally healthy patients (24 males, 15 females; mean age 36 ± 12 years) were recruited. Gingival thickness was measured at 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm apical to the gingival zenith on the facial aspect of maxillary anterior teeth (234 teeth, 702 sites) using both TGP and a CBCT protocol involving radiopaque resin markers. Method agreement was analyzed via Bland-Altman plots and Deming regression. Diagnostic performance of CBCT for classifying gingival phenotype was assessed. RESULTS: CBCT measurements showed a strong correlation with TGP (ρ > 0.98, p 0.95). CBCT demonstrated 100% specificity and > 96% sensitivity for identifying thick phenotypes. No significant differences in gingival thickness were found between genders. CONCLUSION: The novel CBCT-based measurement protocol shows high agreement with gold standard. The identified constant error is clinically negligible, supporting its utility as a reliable, non-invasive method for assessing gingival thickness and phenotype, with potential for integration with digital impression technology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4f39e32b81a944af5747b7https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09155-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper