PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2026Marine Policy0 citationsOpen Access

Characterizing electronic self-reporting programs in United States marine recreational fisheries

KWKate M. WilkeWGWilliam M. GoldsmithDMDavid Moss

Key Points

  • To catalog and evaluate electronic self-reporting programs for recreational fisheries in the U.S.
  • Catalogued 25 electronic self-reporting programs across various species and regions.
  • Syndicated key findings and recommendations based on program characteristics and outcomes.
  • Analyzed factors influencing program success, including motivation and validation protocols.
  • Success of programs varied based on management issues prompting participation.
  • Effective incentives and continuous engagement improved angler participation rates.
  • Stronger validation protocols enhance the reliability of self-reported data.

Abstract

Recreational fisheries can substantially contribute to fishing mortality for numerous stocks, underscoring the importance of effectively managing this sector. However, estimating recreational fishery effort and harvest has been a persistent challenge for scientists and managers. In the United States and elsewhere, there has been a growing interest in using electronic technologies as platforms for recreational anglers to self-report catch and effort data, with such programs proliferating over the past decade. In this study, we catalogued electronic self-reporting programs in U.S. marine private recreational fisheries while synthesizing key findings and recommendations. In total, we identified 25 programs that varied widely by species, region, goals (i.e., catch estimation versus citizen science), level of usage, and motivation for development, among others. We found that program success often depended on a suite of factors including but not limited to: the presence of a pressing fishery or management issue that prompted anglers to participate; creating the right incentive structure to encourage and sustain participation; continuous engagement between self-reporting program administrators and anglers; and strong validation protocols for self-reported data. This research provides actionable recommendations to inform revisions of existing programs and development of future programs, which may result in valuable data collection from private anglers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a59c5a7a58755010b471124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper