PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2026Tourism Planning & Development0 citationsOpen Access

From “Yellow Taxi Lobby” to Infrastructural Power: Tourism Stakeholder Salience and Uber’s Contentious Compliance in Türkiye

View Full Paper
KÇKadir ÇakarWCWenjie CaiSCSamantha Chaperon

Key Points

  • To analyze stakeholder perceptions of power dynamics in relation to Uber's entry into the travel market in Türkiye.
  • Conducted 24 interviews with representatives from local government, tourism associations, trade unions, and hotel management
  • Employed a thematic analysis framework informed by stakeholder salience theory
  • Used an elite sampling strategy for participant selection
  • Stakeholders perceived the taxi lobby as having the greatest power and legitimacy
  • A fragmented voice among stakeholders limited their ability to influence government decision-making
  • Uber's approach of contentious compliance and infrastructural power allowed it to manipulate the governance framework

Abstract

In many destinations, sharing economy platforms have transformed travel services and tourist experiences. This study analyses stakeholder perceptions of power and decision-making during Uber's contested market entry in Istanbul and Antalya. In Türkiye, the taxi lobby wields considerable influence through longstanding political connections and electoral leverage. Using an elite sampling strategy, 24 interviews were conducted with representatives from local government, tourism associations, trade unions, and hotel management. A thematic analysis was informed by stakeholder salience theory and the notion of ‘infrastructural power’. Findings indicate that tourism stakeholders viewed the taxi lobby as omnipotent, with the greatest power, legitimacy, and urgency. Stakeholders lacked a united voice and the power to challenge government decision-making. Uber's strategy of ‘contentious compliance’ and resultant ‘infrastructural power’ was imperceptible, enabling them to manipulate stakeholders and governance structures. Theoretically, the study highlights how infrastructural power reorders stakeholder prioritisation, and practically, we propose infrastructural audits to monitor technological dependency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Çakar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5b17c318557b26c2039de9https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2026.2702419
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper