In patients with atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists, a concurrent cancer diagnosis did not significantly increase the 1-year risk of thromboembolic complications (6.5% vs 5.8%, HR 1.0) compared to patients without cancer.
Cohort (n=68,119)
Does the presence of cancer increase the risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants?
The absolute risks of thromboembolic and bleeding complications are similar in AF patients with and without cancer receiving oral anticoagulation.
Hazard Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.93–1.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.5% vs 5.8%
Abstract Coexisting cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) has been associated with thromboembolism and bleeding. We used Danish population‐based medical databases to conduct a population‐based cohort study that included all AF patients who redeemed a prescription for vitamin K antagonists ( VKA ) or non‐ VKA oral anticoagulant ( NOAC ) between July 2004 and December 2013. We characterized these patients according to the presence ( N = 11,855) or absence ( N = 56,264) of a cancer diagnosis before redemption of their oral anticoagulant prescription, and then examined their 1‐year risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications or death. We next used Cox regression to compare the hazard ratios for complications among VKA ‐ or NOAC ‐treated AF patients with versus without a cancer diagnosis, after adjusting for sex, age, and CHA 2 DS 2 VAS c score. One‐year risks of thromboembolic complications in AF patients who redeemed a VKA prescription were similar in those with (6.5%) and without (5.8%) cancer hazard ratio ( HR ) 1.0 (95% confidence interval ( CI ): 0.93, 1.1). This also was found for bleeding complications (5.4% vs. 4.3%, HR 1.1 95% CI : 1.0, 1.2). For AF patients with cancer who redeemed a NOAC prescription, risks were also similar for thromboembolic complications (4.9% of cancer patients vs. 5.1% of noncancer patients, HR 0.80 95% CI : 0.61, 1.1), and for bleeding complications (4.4% vs. 3.1%, HR 1.2 95% CI : 0.92, 1.7). The absolute risks of thromboembolic or bleeding complications were nearly the same in patients with and without cancer who redeemed prescription for VKA s or NOAC s.
Ording et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=68,119). Cancer diagnosis vs. No cancer diagnosis was evaluated on 1-year risk of thromboembolic complications in patients prescribed a vitamin K antagonist (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.93, 1.1). In patients with atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists, a concurrent cancer diagnosis did not significantly increase the 1-year risk of thromboembolic complications (6.5% vs 5.8%, HR 1.0) compared to patients without cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: