Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, four kinds of flooding systems, high-molecular-weight polymer (HMP), low-molecular-weight polymer (LMP), hydrophobic association polymer (HAP), and LMP/petroleum sulfonate (PS), are preferred. By comparing the static performance, their good basic characteristics as an oil displacement system are clarified. The application concentration range of the polymer solution is optimized and designed in combination with core injectivity experiments and mobility control theory. The oil displacement system and its injection volume have been optimized via three parallel core flooding experiments. The results show that the increase of the polymer molecular weight and the association will enhance the viscosity-increasing performance, viscosity stability, viscoelasticity, and hydrodynamic characteristic size of the solution. According to whether the injection pressure curve reaches equilibrium and the time required for equilibrium, the matching relationship between the polymer and the reservoir can be divided into plugging, flow difficulty and flow smoothly. Based on the mobility control theory, the minimum mobility of the target core occurs when the water saturation is 30-40%. Therefore, the polymer formulation for the application of combined cores with viscosities of 50 mD, 210 mD, and 350 mD is set at 1500 mg/L for LMP and 800 mg/L for MAP. HAP has the best profile improvement effect, but its lowest EOR is 9.68%, which mainly acts on high-permeability layers; LMP can produce more remaining oil in middle-permeability layers, and its EOR can reach 12.01%; LMP/PS can give full play to the oil displacement performance of the polymer and the oil washing ability of the surfactant, and its highest EOR is 21.32%. Meanwhile, the emulsification effect also makes the profile improvement last longer. According to the EOR efficiency and final oil recovery, the optimal injection volume of LMP/PS can be designed to be 0.6-0.7 PV.
Liu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: