PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2004Tobacco Control109 citationsOpen Access

Determination of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields in the mainstream smoke of selected international cigarettes

ACAntonia M. CalafatUniversity of the Faroe IslandsGPGregory PolzinCenters for Disease Control and PreventionJSJ. R. SaylorClemson University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Survey of nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide (CO) smoke deliveries from 77 cigarette brands purchased in 35 countries was conducted using a standardised machine smoking method. The goal of this study was to determine regional variations and differences in the tar, nicotine, and CO smoke yields of a cigarette brand manufactured by a leading transnational corporation and of non-US locally popular cigarette brands. DESIGN: The majority of the cigarettes were purchased in each of the participating countries by delegate members of the World Health Organization and forwarded to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for analysis. Smoke deliveries were determined using a standardised smoking machine method and subsequent gravimetric and gas chromatography analysis. RESULTS: The smoke deliveries varied widely. Mainstream smoke deliveries varied from 6.8 to 21.6 mg tar/cigarette, 0.5 to 1.6 mg nicotine/cigarette, and 5.9 to 17.4 mg CO/cigarette. In addition to the smoke deliveries, the cigarettes were examined to determine physical parameters such as filter composition, length, and ventilation levels. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the smoke deliveries suggested that cigarettes from the Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific WHO regions tended to have higher tar, nicotine, and CO smoke deliveries than did brands from the European, American, or African WHO regions surveyed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Calafat et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f4b85c1a24a6142db5316https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.003673
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper