PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1996Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica22 citations

Screening and treating depressed patients. A comparison of two controlled citalopram trials across treatment settings: hospitalized patients vs. patients treated by their family doctors

View Full Paper
EFE. FuglumCRC. RosenbergNDNiels Damsbo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study is a comparison across treatment settings of two previously published trials, namely the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG) study on citalopram vs. clomipramine in hospitalized patients with major depression, and the Nordic citalopram vs. imipramine study of depressed patients treated by their family doctors. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) had the same level of inter-rater reliability and construct validity in the two settings. Using a HAM-D score of 7 or less as the criterion for full two remission, clomipramine was superior to imipramine and citalopram. Using a reduction of the baseline HAM-D score by 50% or more as a response criterion, there were no differences between the three antidepressants after 5 or 6 weeks of treatment. Citalopram showed superior tolerability to the tricyclic antidepressants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fuglum et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7062c731a3df824328a418https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09819.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper