PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 2017Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging30 citationsOpen Access

Quantification of brown and white adipose tissue based on Gaussian mixture model using water–fat and MRI in adolescents

View Full Paper
SHSteve C. N. HuiJKJacky K. L. KoTZTeng Zhang

Structured PICO

Can a Gaussian mixture model using water-fat MRI accurately separate and quantify brown and white adipose tissue in adolescents?

P
Population
Adolescents (mean age 12.9 ± 2.4 years), including obese and normal-weight participants
I
Intervention
3T MRI with chemical-shift water-fat mDixon sequence and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for clustering brown and white adipose tissue
O
Outcome
Separation and quantification of brown adipose tissue (BAT) and white adipose tissue (WAT) using fat fraction and T2* intensitysurrogate

A Gaussian mixture model applied to water-fat MRI can successfully segment and quantify brown and white adipose tissue in adolescents, showing good reproducibility and differences between obese and normal-weight individuals.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a technique for the separation and quantification of brown adipose tissue (BAT) and white adipose tissue (WAT) using fat fraction and T2* intensity based on the Gaussian mixture model (GMM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: , age = 12.9 ± 2.4) using a 3T scanner with the chemical-shift water-fat mDixon sequence. BAT and WAT were clustered based on the Gaussian mixture model using the expectation-maximization algorithm. Results and reproducibility were compared and assessed using independent t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: BAT in obese participants was predominately found at the supraclavicular region and in normal-weight participants it was more scattered and distributed in interscapular-supraclavicular, axillary, and spine regions. Absolute volume of BAT was higher in the obese group (Obese: 315.2 mL ±89.1, Normal weight: 248.5 mL ±86.4), but BAT/WAT ratios were significantly higher (P = 0.029) in the normal group. T2* of BAT (P = 0.04) and volume of WAT (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the normals. Within-group comparison between male and female indicated no significant differences were found in volume (P = 0.776 (normal), 0.501 obese), T2* (P = 0.908 normal, 0.249 obese) and fat-fraction of BAT (P = 0.985 normal, 0.108 obese). The intraclass correlation coefficient showed a good reproducibility in volume (BAT: 0.997, WAT: 0.948), T2* (BAT: 0.969, WAT: 0.983), and fat-fraction (BAT: 0.952, WAT: 0.517). CONCLUSION: BAT identified by this method was in agreement with other studies in terms of location, fat-fraction value, and T2* intensity. The proposed GMM-based segmentation could be a useful nonradiation imaging method for assessment of adipose tissue, in particular for serial follow-up of volume changes after drug or lifestyle interventions for obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:758-768.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hui et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72593f660549caf2c6969bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25632
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper