PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 2, 2020Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology32 citations

Association of Risk of Dementia With Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Use in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

View Full Paper
ZLZong Xuan LeeEAEshen AngXLXin Tian Lim

Key Result

Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of composite dementia outcomes compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.94; P=0.03).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=611,069)

Structured PICO

Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of dementia compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
611,069 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation included across 9 comparative studies.
I
Intervention
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as a class, including dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
Composite dementia outcomescomposite

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs may be superior to warfarin in preventing dementia, though current evidence is of low certainty.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.56 (95% CI 0.34–0.94)

p-value: p=0.03

Limitations

  • Low certainty of evidence
  • Lack of prospective trials with adequate follow-up periods to ascertain causal relationship

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of dementia. Studies have shown the beneficial effects of anticoagulants in preventing dementia in this population. However, evidence around the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in AF-related dementia prevention remains sparse. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the use of DOACs versus warfarin in dementia prevention in this population. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from its inception until May 2020. Nine studies (n = 611,069) were included for quantitative meta-analysis. DOACs use was associated with a lower risk of composite dementia outcomes compared with warfarin use odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.94, P = 0.03. No significant difference was found in subtypes of dementia (vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive disorder) between both groups. No significant difference in the risk of composite dementia outcomes between the dabigatran and warfarin groups (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08, P = 0.61). Apixaban (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, P < 0.00001) and rivaroxaban (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.75, P < 0.00001) use were both associated with a significantly lower risk of composite dementia outcomes compared with warfarin use. Findings need to be interpreted with caution because of low certainty of evidence. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 comparative studies demonstrated the superiority of DOACs over warfarin in prevention of dementia in AF. Future prospective trials with adequate follow-up period are warranted to ascertain its causal relationship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (n=611,069). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite dementia outcomes (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, p=0.03). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of composite dementia outcomes compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.94; P=0.03).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c5f393f411608c626be9fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/fjc.0000000000000925
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper