PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 18, 2005Anesthesia & Analgesia122 citations

Hemodynamic Responses to Etomidate on Induction of Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients

View Full Paper
MSMolly SarkarPLPeter C. LaussenDZDavid Zurakowski

Structured PICO

Does an IV bolus of etomidate cause significant hemodynamic changes during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?

P
Population
12 children undergoing cardiac catheterization (mean age 9.2 ± 4.8 years, mean weight 33.4 ± 15.4 kg), including device closure of secundum atrial septal defects (n=7) and radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia (n=5).
I
Intervention
IV etomidate bolus (0.3 mg/kg) during induction of anesthesia
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements prior to etomidate administration
O
Outcome
Acute changes in right atrial, aortic, or pulmonary artery pressure, oxygen saturations, calculated Qp:Qs ratio, and systemic or pulmonary vascular resistancesurrogate

An IV bolus of etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) does not cause significant acute hemodynamic changes in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, supporting its safety profile.

Limitations

  • Further research is needed to determine the hemodynamic profile of etomidate in neonates and in pediatric patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension.

Abstract

In Brief Etomidate is often used for inducing anesthesia in patients who have limited hemodynamic reserve. Using invasive hemodynamic monitoring, we studied the acute effects of a bolus of etomidate during induction of anesthesia in children. Twelve children undergoing cardiac catheterization were studied (mean age, 9.2 ± 4.8 yr; mean weight, 33.4 ± 15.4 kg); catheterization procedures included device closure of secundum atrial septal defects (n = 7) and radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia (n = 5). Using IV sedation, a balloon-tipped pulmonary artery catheter was placed to measure intracardiac and pulmonary artery pressures and oxygen saturations. Baseline measurements were recorded and then re-peated after a bolus of IV etomidate (0.3 mg/kg). For the entire group, no significant changes in right atrial, aortic, or pulmonary artery pressure, oxygen saturations, calculated Qp:Qs ratio or systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance were detected after the bolus dose of etomidate. The lack of clinically significant hemodynamic changes after etomidate administration supports the clinical impression that etomidate is safe in children. Further research is needed to determine the hemodynamic profile of etomidate in neonates and in pediatric patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. IMPLICATIONS: Etomidate is a frequently used induction anesthetic in patients with limited hemodynamic reserve. Using invasive hemodynamic monitoring, the acute effects of etomidate during induction of anesthesia in children were studied. The lack of clinically significant hemodynamic changes after etomidate administration supports the notion that etomidate is safe in pediatric practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarkar et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f301363e03285017c9ea4https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000166764.99863.b4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Etomidate: Applications in pediatric critical care and pediatric anesthesiology2000 · 25 citations
  2. 2Etomidate in pediatric anesthesiology: Where are we now?2015 · 7 citations
  3. 3Etomidate Use and Postoperative Outcomes among Cardiac Surgery Patients2013 · 52 citations
  4. 4Etomidate for anesthesia induction: friends or foe in major cardiac surgery?2014 · 14 citations
  5. 5Intubating Conditions and Hemodynamic Effects of Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study2006 · 37 citations