PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2023Frontiers in Endocrinology10 citationsOpen Access

Association of baseline Life’s Essential 8 score and trajectories with carotid intima-media thickness

QLQian LiuHCHaozhe CuiSCShuohua Chen

Structured PICO

Does a higher Life's Essential 8 score reduce carotid intima-media thickness in a community population without prior cardiovascular disease?

P
Population
12,980 participants from the Kailuan study (a functional community population in Tangshan, China) without a history of cardiovascular disease and without missing data on Life's Essential 8 metrics. Mean age 48.41 years, 63.20% male.
I
Intervention
High baseline Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score (quintiles Q2-Q5) and favorable LE8 score trajectories (low-stable, median-stable, high-stable) from 2006 to 2010.
C
Comparator
Lowest quintile of baseline LE8 score (Q1) and very low-stable LE8 score trajectory group.
O
Outcome
Continuous carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and risk of high cIMT (defined by age- and sex-specific 90th percentile cut point).surrogate

Higher baseline Life's Essential 8 scores and maintaining high scores over time are associated with lower carotid intima-media thickness and a reduced risk of subclinical atherosclerosis.

Limitations

  • Cross-sectional study design cannot verify causality
  • Only one data point from ultrasound scan, so cIMT progression was not observed
  • Participants were all from the Kailuan study, so findings have not been validated in other populations
  • Potential residual confounding from taking drugs, education differences, hypertension, and diabetes

Abstract

Objective We aimed to examine the association between the baseline Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) score and LE8 score trajectories with the continuous carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) as well as the risk of high cIMT. Methods The Kailuan study has been an ongoing prospective cohort study since 2006. A total of 12,980 participants who completed the first physical examination and cIMT detection at follow-up without a history of CVD and missing data on the component of LE8 metrics in or before 2006 were finally included in the analysis. The LE8 score trajectories were developed from 2006 to 2010 using trajectory modeling of the SAS procedure Proc Traj. The measurement and result review of the cIMT were performed by specialized sonographers using standardized methods. According to quintiles of baseline LE8 score, participants were categorized into five groups: Q 1, Q 2, Q 3, Q 4, and Q 5. Similarly, based on their LE8 score trajectories, they were classified into four groups: very low-stable group, low-stable group, median-stable group, and high-stable group. In addition to continuous cIMT measurement, we determined the high cIMT based on the age (by 5 years) and sex-specific 90th percentile cut point. To address aims 1 and 2, the association between baseline/trajectory groups and continuous cIMT/high cIMT was assessed by using SAS proc genmod to calculate β, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 12,980 participants were finally included in aim 1, and 8,758 participants met aim 2 of the association between LE8 trajectories and cIMT/high cIMT. Compared with the Q 1 group, the continuous cIMT for Q 2, Q 3, Q 4, and Q 5 groups were thinner; the other groups had a lower risk of high cIMT. For aim 2, the results indicated that compared with a very low-stable group, the cIMT for the low-stable group, the median-stable group, and the high-stable group were thinner (−0.07 mm 95% CI −0.10~0.04 mm, −0.10 mm 95% CI −0.13~−0.07 mm, −0.12 mm 95% CI −0.16~−0.09 mm) and had a lower risk of high cIMT. The RR (95% CI) for high cIMT was 0.84 (0.75~0.93) in the low-stable group, 0.63 (0.57~0.70) in the median-stable group, 0.52 (0.45~0.59) in the high-stable group. Conclusions In summary, our study revealed that high baseline LE8 scores and LE8 score trajectories were associated with lower continuous cIMT and attenuated risk of high cIMT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f500543baed7cc6d68792https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1186880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper