PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2006The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism249 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Characterization of Familial Isolated Pituitary Adenomas

View Full Paper
ADAdrian DalyMJMarie‐Lise Jaffrain‐ReaACA. Ciccarelli

Structured PICO

P
Population
138 affected individuals from 64 familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) families (MEN1/PRKAR1A-mutation negative) and a sporadic population
C
Comparator
Sporadic pituitary adenoma population
O
Outcome
Clinical and genealogical characteristics (including age at diagnosis, tumor size, and phenotype)

Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) present with distinct clinical characteristics compared to sporadic cases, including a younger age at diagnosis, suggesting it may represent a novel endocrine neoplasia classification.

Abstract

CONTEXT: Familial pituitary adenomas occur rarely in the absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and Carney complex (CNC). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the clinical and genealogical features of non-MEN1/CNC familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective study of clinical and genealogical characteristics of FIPA cases and performed a comparison with a sporadic population at 22 university hospitals in Belgium, Italy, France, and The Netherlands. RESULTS: Sixty-four FIPA families including 138 affected individuals were identified 55 prolactinomas, 47 somatotropinomas, 28 nonsecreting adenomas (NS), and eight ACTH-secreting tumors. Cases were MEN1/PRKAR1A-mutation negative. First-degree relationships predominated (75.6%) among affected individuals. A single tumor phenotype occurred in 30 families (homogeneous), and heterogeneous phenotypes occurred in 34 families. FIPA cases were younger at diagnosis than sporadic cases (P = 0.015); tumors were diagnosed earlier in the first vs. the second generation of multigenerational families. Macroadenomas were more frequent in heterogeneous vs. homogeneous FIPA families (P = 0.036). Prolactinomas from heterogeneous families were larger and had more frequent suprasellar extension (P = 0.004) than sporadic cases. Somatotropinomas occurred as isolated familial somatotropinoma cases and within heterogeneous FIPA families; isolated familial somatotropinoma cases represented 18% of FIPA cases and were younger at diagnosis than patients with sporadic somatotropinomas. Familial NS cases were younger at diagnosis (P = 0.03) and had more frequently invasive tumors (P = 0.024) than sporadic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Homogeneous and heterogeneous expression of prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, NS, and Cushing's disease can occur within families in the absence of MEN1/CNC. FIPA and sporadic cases have differing clinical characteristics. FIPA may represent a novel endocrine neoplasia classification that requires further genetic characterization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daly et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8674d785b962098c2fdd1fhttps://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper