PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001The Journal of Biochemistry23 citations

Two New Modes of Smooth Muscle Myosin Regulation by the Interaction between the Two Regulatory Light Chains, and by the S2 Domain

View Full Paper
KKK. KonishiSKSatoko KojimaTKT. Kotah

Structured PICO

P
Population
Recombinant mutant smooth muscle heavy meromyosins (HMMs) (Delta MD, Delta(MD+ELC), single-headed HMM) and S1 fragments
I
Intervention
Phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC)
C
Comparator
Unphosphorylated state, wild-type HMM, and S1 fragment
O
Outcome
Basal and actin-activated ATPase activitiessurrogate

The S2 domain of smooth muscle myosin has an inhibitory function that is canceled by the interaction between two phosphorylated regulatory light chains, and cooperative interaction between two motor domains is required for higher actin activation.

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that single-headed smooth muscle myosin and S1 (a single head fragment) are not regulated through phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC). To investigate the importance of the double-headedness of myosin and of the S2 region for the phosphorylation-dependent regulation, we made three types of recombinant mutant smooth muscle HMMs with one intact head and an N-terminally truncated head. The truncated head of Delta MD lacked the motor domain, that of Delta(MD+ELC) lacked the motor and essential light chain binding domains, and single-headed HMM had one intact head alone. The basal ATPase activities of the three mutants decreased as the KCl concentration became less than 0.1 M. Such a decrease was not observed for S1, which had no S2 region, suggesting that S2 is necessary for this myosin behavior. This activity decrease also disappeared when RLCs of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC), but that of single-headed HMM, were phosphorylated. When their RLCs were unphosphorylated, the three mutants exhibited similar actin-activated ATPase levels. However, when they were phosphorylated, the actin-activated ATPase activities of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC) increased to the S1 level, while that of single-headed HMM remained unchanged. Even in the phosphorylated state, the actin-activated ATPase activities of the three mutants and S1 were much lower than that of wild-type HMM. We propose that S2 has an inhibitory function that is canceled by an interaction between two phosphorylated RLCs. We also propose that a cooperative interaction between two motor domains is required for a higher level of actin activation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Konishi et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8c172ae066a6a97ec46a12https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002866
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Interaction between the Regulatory Light Chain Domains on Two Heads Is Critical for Regulation of Smooth Muscle Myosin2000 · 29 citations
  2. 2Two Functional Heads Are Required for Full Activation of Smooth Muscle Myosin2003 · 8 citations
  3. 3Regulation of Asymmetric Smooth Muscle Myosin II Molecules2000 · 22 citations
  4. 4Regulation of expressed truncated smooth muscle myosins. Role of the essential light chain and tail length.1994 · 123 citations
  5. 5Two Heads Are Required for Phosphorylation-dependent Regulation of Smooth Muscle Myosin1995 · 93 citations