PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Sub-Planckian Discrete Spacetime Calibrated by Dirac's Large-Number Ratio: Effective Field Theory Bounds, Sector Invariants, and a Ten-Condition Falsifiability Roadmap

View Full Paper
PLPeter Luh

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We evaluate the continuum limit of a discrete spacetime substrate with fundamental spacing fixed by Dirac's large-number ratio Q ~ 4. 17 x 10⁴2. At the sub-Planckian scale deltaₚ = LP / Q ~ 3. 88 x 10^-78 m, we examine electrodynamics recovery and the leading Lorentz-violating corrections within an effective-field-theory framework. Lattice spatial parity symmetry eliminates odd-order finite-difference terms, excluding dimension-5 operators and cubic energy corrections. The leading residual correction is quadratic in the grid spacing, O (deltaₚ²), modifying photon dispersion at dimension 6. An angular prefactor g (theta, phi) encodes its directional structure, vanishing along the Cartesian axes and peaking at 2/3 along the space diagonals. Applying g (theta, phi) to the infrared condition (BC9) places the predicted dispersion correction roughly 55 orders of magnitude below current ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray bounds while predicting zero vacuum birefringence. Algebraic analysis isolates two scale invariants, zeta* ~ 10. 91 and K* = Q², once unit-convention scale factors are removed. Matching against Newton's gravitational constant GN reduces K* to a calibration constraint. The paper's primary contribution is organizational: a ten-condition falsifiability roadmap (BC1-BC10) converting these results into explicit, numerically checkable failure criteria. Among five evaluated conditions, BC1 fails under unconstrained bulk volume counting. BC2 satisfies spatial isotropy via cubic point-group symmetry. BC4's entropic construction underestimates GN by Q². BC5 achieves topological quantization but underestimates the empirical fine-structure constant alpha by a factor of 80. Five conditions remain open.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peter Luh (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f14b6c1a8fb52e79e13chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22162522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper