PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001Journal of Periodontology54 citations

Long‐Term Results of Guided Tissue Regeneration Therapy With Non‐Resorbable and Bioabsorbable Barriers. I. Class II Furcations

View Full Paper
PEPeter EickholzTKTi‐Sun KimRHRolf Holle

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this 5-year follow-up study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate the long-term results after guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy of Class II furcation defects using non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. METHODS: Nine pairs of contralateral Class II furcation defects were treated in 9 patients with advanced periodontitis. Within each patient, one defect received a non-resorbable (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene ePTFE; control, C) barrier and the other a bioabsorbable (polyglactin 910; test, T) barrier by random assignment. At baseline, 6, and 60 +/- 3 months after surgery, clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained. Gain of bone density within furcation areas was assessed using subtraction radiography. RESULTS: Six and 60 months after GTR therapy, statistically significant (P <0.05) horizontal attachment (CAL-H) gain was observed in both groups (C6: 1.7 +/- 0.8 mm; C60: 1.6 +/- 1.2 mm; T6: 2.0 +/- 0.7 mm; T60: 2.2 +/- 0.9 mm). However, 1 furcation assessed as Class I six months after GTR therapy with a bioabsorbable barrier had progressed to Class III after 5 years, and in another patient, 5 years after placement of an ePTFE barrier, 1 furcation had lost all the CAL-H gain that had been observed at 6 months. Subtraction analysis revealed similar area gain in both groups 6 and 60 months postsurgically (C6: 0.3 +/- 0.5; C60 1.0 +/- 1.7; T6: 0.4 +/- 0.4; T60: 1.1 +/- 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: CAL-H gain achieved after GTR therapy in Class II furcations was stable after 5 years in 16 of 18 defects. The study failed to show a statistically significant difference in stability of CAL-H gain between control and test groups 5 years after GTR therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eickholz et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9752770c3d3cab419d8b21https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.1.35
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper