PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1994Journal of the American College of Cardiology467 citationsOpen Access

Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry

View Full Paper
MCManuel D. CerqueiraCardiac ImagingMVMario S. VeraniCardiac ImagingMSMarkus SchwaigerUniversity of Pisa

Key Result

Adenosine infusion was safe and well tolerated, though patients ≥70 years had a higher risk of transient AV block compared to those <70 years (9.44% vs 7.05%; RR 1.37, P=0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=9,256)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Is adenosine infusion safe when used for stress perfusion imaging?

P
Population
9,256 consecutive patients unable to exercise who underwent radionuclide perfusion imaging with adenosine infusion across 21 clinical sites.
E
Exposure
Adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min in conjunction with radionuclide imaging.
O
Outcome
Safety and adverse events during and immediately after adenosine infusion.safety

Adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min is a safe pharmacologic stress agent for radionuclide imaging, with rare serious adverse events that reverse upon termination.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 1.37

Absolute Event Rate: 9.44% vs 7.05%

p-value: p=0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min in conjunction with radionuclide imaging in 9,256 consecutive patients. BACKGROUND: Adenosine produces maximal myocardial hyperemia directly with a rapid onset of action. In addition, when used in conjunction with radionuclide perfusion imaging, it has proven efficacy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise. Because the ultrashort half-life ( 70 years of age had an increased risk of developing AV block (age or = 70, 9.44%, p = 0.001, relative risk 1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine infusion is safe. Vasodilator and negative dromotropic side effects are generally well tolerated. Serious side effects are relatively rare, and they reverse with termination of adenosine infusion. Interpretable radionuclide studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients and aminophylline reversal was seldom required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cerqueira et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=9,256). Adenosine infusion was evaluated on Atrioventricular (AV) node block (age ≥70 vs <70 years) (RR 1.37, p=0.001). Adenosine infusion was safe and well tolerated, though patients ≥70 years had a higher risk of transient AV block compared to those <70 years (9.44% vs 7.05%; RR 1.37, P=0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2eac7a25963cecb13acbchttps://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise.1990 · 302 citations
  2. 2Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging1992 · 177 citations
  3. 3Safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise and those with left bundle branch block1992 · 60 citations
  4. 4The cardiac effects of adenosine1989 · 771 citations
  5. 5Effect of intravenous adenosine infusion on myocardial perfusion and function. Hemodynamic/angiographic and scintigraphic study.1992 · 118 citations