Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in treating severe aortic and aorto-iliac calcifications. The aim of this study is to report current available data about the use of IVL in treating aortic and aorto-iliac calcified lesions and its application in facilitating other endovascular procedures. Methods: the present review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Preliminary searches were conducted on MEDLINE and Pubmed from January 2015 to February 2025. Studies were divided into 3 main categories depending on the location of calcifications and the type of treatment: IVL in visceral and infrarenal obstructive disease (group 1), IVL in aorto-iliac obstructive disease (group 2), IVL used to facilitate other endovascular procedures. Main primary outcomes in the perioperative period were technical and clinical successes and perioperative complications. Primary outcomes at 30 days and mid-term (2 years) were overall survival, limb salvage rate, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and residual stenosis. Results: Sixteen studies were identified for a total of 1674 patients. Technical and clinical successes were 100%, with low rates of perioperative complications. Dissection rate reaches up to 16.1% in some studies, without any differences compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) alone (22.8%; p = 0.47). At 30 days, limb salvage and survival rates were 100%. At 2 years, primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 95%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, with no difference compared to IVL + stenting. Conclusions: IVL has emerged as a novel approach to treat severe calcified lesions in visceral and aorto-iliac atherosclerotic disease and to facilitate other endovascular procedures. This technique seems to offer satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes in terms of primary, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency with low complication rates.
Troisi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.