This study explores the feasibility of using 3D printing technology to fabricate reference materials for validating compressive strength measurements in construction laboratories. Polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG) were selected due to their widespread availability and use in fused deposition modeling (FDM). A series of cubic samples with varying infill levels and dimensions were printed and tested to evaluate the influence of infill density, temperature, and storage time on compressive strength. PLA samples exhibited higher compressive strength values (from 23.5 kN for 10% infill to 70.7 kN for 50% infill) and a steeper increase in strength with rising infill density compared to PETG (from 12.4 kN for 10% infill to 44.1 kN for 50% infill). However, PETG demonstrated superior stability over time, with significantly smaller increases in result variability after 31 days. The results confirm a strong linear correlation between infill level and compressive strength and indicate that even small fluctuations in ambient temperature can influence test outcomes. Despite PLA’s initial mechanical advantage, PETG’s aging resistance makes it a promising candidate for the development of durable and repeatable reference materials (increment of StD for PLA from 0.17 kN to 0.63 kN and 0.25 kN to 0.37 for PET-G). This research contributes to closing the gap in the availability of reliable mechanical reference materials for destructive testing, offering a novel application for 3D printing in quality control in civil engineering.
Budziński et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: