This study investigated the relationship between leader technical skills and the performance of state agencies in Kenya, with a specific focus on the moderating effect of board composition. The research employed a mixed-method design with a post-positivist approach, targeting 135 state agencies in Kenya, from which a sample size of 100 was selected. Data was gathered using semi-structured questionnaires and secondary data from public annual reports. The findings indicate a significant positive relationship between a leader's technical skills and agency performance. Leader technical skills, which are defined as the practical knowledge and competencies required to manage bureaucratic systems and implement policies, were found to account for 33.6% of the variance in the performance of state agencies. The regression analysis confirmed that an increase in a leader's technical proficiency directly correlates with improved agency performance. The study's most significant finding is that board composition acts as a key moderating variable. When board composition was added to the statistical model, the explained variance in agency performance increased to 56.8%. This suggests that the effect of a leader's technical skills is amplified by a board's expertise, diversity, and independence. The conclusion drawn from this is that high performance in Kenyan state agencies is the result of a synergistic relationship between a technically skilled leader and a well-composed, competent board that provides strategic oversight and an ethical framework. Recommendations for policymakers include a dual focus on recruiting and training leaders with technical skills and reforming board appointment processes to ensure expertise, independence, and diversity
M’mutiga et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: