Abstract In rapidly urbanizing cities, historical neighborhoods often experience drastic spatial transformation, leading to the erosion of urban form, memory, and identity. This study examines the morphological transformation of the Siwenli Lilong neighborhood in central Shanghai, tracing its evolution from 1948 to 2021. Drawing on a 70-year fine-scale GIS dataset at the lane-block level which is a rare longitudinal resolution in related urban research, the study integrates historical cartography, urban morphology, and heritage interpretation to identify three key phases: wartime densification, socialist consolidation, and market-driven redevelopment. Each phase reflects distinct governance rationales, cumulatively producing a shift from spatial continuity to fragmentation. The research introduces the concept of “interface rupture” to capture the disjunction between old and new typologies, particularly in façade logic and public–private transitions. Rather than treating transformation as incidental, it proposes a conceptual model linking governance regimes, development logics, and spatial consequences. While symbolic heritage elements are selectively retained, most morphological memory is weakened or erased. By integrating urban morphology with the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) framework, the study contributes to heritage-led urbanism by moving beyond site-specific diagnosis toward transferable explanatory mechanisms. It calls for adaptive conservation frameworks that recognize spatial memory as a planning asset, promoting continuity during inevitable change. The Siwenli case thus serves as both empirical evidence and a theoretical lens for understanding structural dynamics behind morphological rupture in East Asian cities.
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.