What type of study is this?

This is a Cross-Sectional study.

September 5, 2025Open Access

Risk of Diabetes-Specific Eating Disorders in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A CGM-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Key Points

Children with type 1 diabetes using continuous insulin infusion showed a higher median DEPS-R score than those using traditional injections, but not significantly.
The presence of diabetes-specific eating disorders was 30% in the continuous infusion group, while 20.4% in the multiple daily injections group, with no significant difference.
Analysis revealed positive correlations of DEPS-R scores with diabetes duration and glycemic measures, while indicating beneficial effects of CSII on eating disorder risk.
The findings suggest that continuous insulin infusion may assist in managing eating disorders in poorly controlled diabetes patients.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Eating disorders are one of the most widespread health concerns, mainly among adolescents. Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have been reported to have a high prevalence of eating disorders. The aim of our study is to evaluate the risk of diabetes-specific eating disorders in children with T1DM using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), with real-time glycemic data from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Materials and Methods: Sixty-four patients (aged 7–18 years) completed the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R). The DEPS-R is a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire to assess diabetes-specific compensatory behaviors. Auxological findings, sex, age, age at diagnosis, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and all CGM data were obtained from their medical records. Results: Although the median DEPS-R score was higher in children and adolescents using CSII compared to those using multiple daily injections (MDIs) (14 vs. 11), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.302). The risk of diabetes-specific eating disorders was identified in six patients (30%) using CSII and in nine patients (20.4%) using multiple daily injections (p = 0.403). Interestingly, in the subgroup with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 9%), DEPS-R scores were significantly lower among those using CSII compared to the MDI group. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated positive associations between DEPS-R scores and diabetes duration, weight SDS, body mass index (BMI), BMI SDS, HbA1c, mean glucose, Glucose Management Indicator (GMI), time above range (TAR) (very high), and coefficient of variation (CV), while a moderate negative correlation was observed with time in range (TIR). Conclusions: This study showed that the treatment of CSII had a beneficial effect on the risk of eating disorders in patients with poor glycemic control. As well, from this perspective, CSII maintains its status as a potentially beneficial therapeutic approach in diabetes management.

Read Full Paperexternally

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper