Interoperability between Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Facility Management (FM) depends on open, vendor-neutral standards. Yet, operational uptake remains constrained by fragmented workflows, incompatible schemas, and non-standardized delivery. This critical review synthesizes OpenBIM pathways—within the buildingSMART ecosystem (Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), Construction–Operations Building information exchange (COBie), Information Delivery Specification (IDS) v1.0, buildingSMART Data Dictionary (bSDD)) and the Level of Information Need (ISO 7817-1:2024)—across technical, managerial, and strategic dimensions. We searched major databases and used guided snowballing to screen a core corpus. Technically, persistent semantic inconsistencies and limited real-time, bidirectional exchange remain; open standards enable machine-checkable deliverables and API-friendly serializations. Managerially, weak Organizational Information Requirements (OIR) → Asset Information Requirements (AIR) → Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) alignment and unclear acceptance criteria undermine FM readiness. Strategically, procurement and risk management should mitigate vendor lock-in. We highlight gaps in FM ontologies and BIM–IoT synchronization and outline an agenda for Digital Twins, automation, and verifiable FM data quality within OpenBIM ecosystems.
Chatsuwan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: