Blood group classification plays a vital role in medical emergencies, transfusion management, and personalized healthcare. Traditional methods rely on serological testing, which requires invasive sampling and laboratory infrastructure. This study proposes a novel, non-invasive system for predicting human blood groups using fingerprint images. Our solution leverages a hybrid deep learning model combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to capture both local texture patterns and high-level fingerprint topology. The proposed system consists of a robust preprocessing pipeline that converts grayscale fingerprint images to a normalized format suitable for hybrid feature extraction. The CNN component extracts spatial texture features, while the GNN component analyzes relational structures and ridge connectivity. The final classification is performed through a dense layer that outputs the predicted blood group among the eight major categories (A+, A-, B+, B-, AB+, AB-, O+, O-). To facilitate real-world deployment and ease of use, the system includes optional IoT integration via the R307S fingerprint scanner. Users can either upload fingerprint images through a web interface or scan their fingerprints directly using the R307S scanner connected to a microcontroller (e.g., Arduino). A unified Python backend (predict.py) handles both data paths seamlessly, supporting flexible deployment in both standalone and server-based applications. The dataset comprises over 6000 fingerprint samples across all blood group classes. With 100 training epochs and a batch size of 32, the model achieved a training accuracy of ~70% and demonstrated early signs of generalizability, despite the inherent biological variability in fingerprint patterns across individuals. This project serves as a proof-of-concept that fingerprint morphology can be correlated to blood groups using deep learning, offering a low-cost, non-invasive alternative to traditional blood group testing. It also opens up possibilities for use in rural healthcare, forensic identification, and embedded biometric devices.
Chelli Dileep (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: