Background:Beta-blockers are foundational in the management of myocardial infarction (MI). However, their long-term utility in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%) remains uncertain in the modern reperfusion era.Objective:To systematically review and synthesize contemporary evidence evaluating the impact of long-term beta-blocker therapy on mortality, reinfarction, and hemodynamic outcomes in post-MI patients with preserved ejection fraction.Methods:A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews evaluating long-term beta-blocker therapy in post-MI patients with LVEF ≥50%.Results:Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority found no significant mortality benefit associated with long-term beta-blockers in patients without heart failure. Subgroup analyses showed potential benefits in individuals with elevated heart rate or hypertension. Several studies emphasized the short-term utility of beta-blockers, particularly within the first year post-MI.Conclusion:In the era of modern revascularization and medical therapy, the routine continuation of beta-blockers in MI survivors with preserved EF may not confer long-term survival benefits. A tailored, patient-centered approach should guide therapy decisions.
ELSAYED et al. (Wed,) studied this question.