This study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamics in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing gastroenteroscopy. In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 220 hypertensive patients (65-75 years) scheduled for gastroenteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam (group R, n=110; 0.3 mg/kg induction followed by 0.2-1 mg/kg/h maintenance) or propofol (group P, n=110; 1.5 mg/kg induction followed by 2-6 mg/kg/h maintenance), both combined with 0.1 μg/kg sufentanil. Flumazenil or placebo was administered for reversal. Hemodynamics were monitored via Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure (CNAP). The primary outcomes were hypotension incidence and hemodynamic parameters mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR); secondary outcomes included the incidence of other adverse events and recovery time. Group R exhibited significantly lower incidences of hypotension (72.7% vs 37.3%, p < 0.001) and bradycardia (16.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.037), alongside reduced vasopressor requirements (ephedrine: 3.760 ± 4.133 vs.1.850 ± 3.121, p < 0.001; metaraminol: 0.101 ± 0.208 vs 0.045 ± 0.144, p = 0.012). Both groups exhibited decreased MAP, CO, and SVR at the time point of endoscope entry (T1) compared to 2 minutes before anesthesia induction (T0), while HR reduction was significant only in group P (p < 0.001 vs p = 0.084 in group R). From T1 through 15 minutes post-procedure (T4), group R maintained higher MAP and HR than group P (p < 0.05). Remimazolam was associated with shorter recovery time (p < 0.001), lower rates of respiratory depression (p = 0.002), but higher rates of body movements (p < 0.001) and cough (p = 0.001). Remimazolam provides superior hemodynamic stability and faster recovery compared to propofol in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing gastroenteroscopy, establishing it as a safer sedation option for this vulnerable patient population. Registration number, ChiCTR2400083757; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=214795.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ae7754b1d3bfb60e67ad — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s532746
Qian Gu
Hunan Normal University
deling zeng
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Dayong Lin
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Drug Design Development and Therapy
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu Medical College
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...