This paper explores the geopolitical dynamics of climate funding, focusing on how programs like the JustEnergy Transition Partnership (JETP) perpetuate colonial legacies under the guise of aid. While nations likethe United States and the European Union claim to support climate action, their policies often reinforceeconomic dominance over the Global South through mechanisms such as climate capitalism. Grants andloans, marketed as solutions, frequently bind recipient nations to extractive systems that prioritize marketinterests over justice. The paper critiques the historical continuity of fossil fuel extraction as a colonialpractice that repositions the Global South as a provider of raw materials and cheap labor. It calls for areevaluation of the Western perspective on energy, which commodifies it and disregards ecological andsocial costs. Instead, the paper advocates for a decolonial approach that integrates Indigenous values andecological stewardship. Drawing inspiration from concepts like Buen Vivir, rooted in Quechua traditions,and Arturo Escobar’s “pluriversal” framework, the analysis highlights the potential for alternativeparadigms that honor interconnectedness. These perspectives challenge Western dualisms—nature versusculture, emotion versus reason—offering inclusive ways of thinking. The paper also discusses Bolivia’s andEcuador’s recognition of nature as a legal subject, exemplifying diplomatic cosmologies that align legalsystems with ecological values. Ultimately, the decolonial perspective offers a path toward an energytransition that prioritizes justice, sustainability, and the dignity of all life forms
Fauzi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.