Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that limits function due to reduced space for neurovascular structures. Traditional direct open lumbar decompression (DOLD) is the standard treatment after conservative measures fail. Recently, minimally invasive options such as percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD), interspinous spacers (ISS), and interspinous fixation devices (ISFD) have gained popularity for moderate LSS without spinal instability. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ISFD in patients with LSS treated at our center. Data from 45 patients (26 males, 19 females) treated with ISFD between January 2023 and October 2024 were analyzed. Adverse events and pain outcomes were recorded using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure. Only one minor complication was reported on the procedure day. procedure day. Mean NRS pain scores improved from 7.5 (baseline) to 3.5 (2 weeks), 3.0 (1 month), and 3.5 (3 months) (P < 0.001). At 2 weeks, 50% of patients had pain reductions ≥51%; at 1 month, 57.4% experienced ≥51% reduction; and by 3 months, 73% had more than 50% pain reduction (P < 0.001), indicating significant pain improvement over time. This was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size and relatively short follow-up time. ISFD appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for LSS. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to compare devices and refine procedural techniques.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Soto et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d60654b1d3bfb60f95d7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s522987
Eliezer Soto
University of Central Florida
Michael Esposito
University of Central Florida
Journal of Pain Research
University of Central Florida
Florida College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: